/u/pieceofpaper75 on "asexuals aren't oppressed so they aren't LGBT!"
I only judged your character now, so it wouldn't have been twice and there's no reason for you to ignore the points I made in my first reply. It would only be ad hominem if I were arguing with you about something else and if your character was not directly connected to the conclusion. At that point, I was just criticizing your character, which if you do not know is not a fallacy. I was not using your character to prove some other point or deny any of yours. My point was the very characterization I was making. You make the assumption that I misjudged you without any justification or defense.
January 18, 2020 at 11:59PM
Comments
Post a Comment
Add Comments, Posts, Links... etc.